![e xs max bioshock infinite images e xs max bioshock infinite images](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1LYYiXizxK1RjSspjq6AS.pXaa/Yinuoda-Bioshock-infinite-Luxury-TPU-Rubber-Phone-Case-cover-for-Apple-iPhone-8-7-6-6S.jpg)
![e xs max bioshock infinite images e xs max bioshock infinite images](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/63/cd/59/63cd5991f6e62bbdcef8166de6427099.jpg)
![e xs max bioshock infinite images e xs max bioshock infinite images](https://d3isma7snj3lcx.cloudfront.net/optim/images/photos/00/01/39/91/bioshock-infinite-screenshot-ME0001399153_2__930_250__0-68-1280-413.jpg)
The 6200U only lags behind the 6500U installed here by 5/9% and 7/12% (R15/R11.5 both multi/single). The advantage in processing performance is very marginal, and thus buying the more expensive Core i7 model is only worthwhile for specific high-performance application fields. There is nothing to complain about here, which the charts confirm. also with the best possible multi-core performance. The Core i5-6200U in the sister model performed these tests at 2.7 GHz (max. The SoC even maintains its 2.9 GHz after one hour of looping Cinebench R15. That is an impressive and, above all, stable Turbo utilization at its very best. 3.0 GHz are even sometimes observed at initiation, but only for 20 to 40 seconds depending on casing and ambient temperature. The dual-core performs the multi-core test at a stable 2.9 GHz, which is clearly within the Turbo range. Dell could not provide us with it at date of publication, but we will try it when it is available.Īs usual, we look at the clock behavior during multiple Cinebench tests. However, Dell had to admit that the trick does not work on XPS 13 FHD devices. Dell has a tool for QHD+ XPS 13 systems for disabling CABC for these users - or also for certain application fields. Upon inquiry, Dell replied that the Content Adaptive Brightness Control (CABC) functioned properly, but there were some inquiries from customers who find that annoying. The reason might be Dell's Content Adaptive Backlight Control (CABC), which is a Firmware-based control of the screen's brightness according to the content. The screen's brightness no longer corresponds with the good rates of the XPS 13-9343 touch/non-touch, anyway. The brightness thus still has a bit of potential. However, the sensor in our XPS remained active, which we recorded via different rates depending on whether we covered the sensor beside the webcam (center: 285 cd/m²), left it uncovered (308 cd/m²) or illuminated with a small lamp (323 cd/m²). We did not observe visible fluctuation in the base brightness as is common for sensors (ambient light) after disabling this option. We measure the TFT's brightness using disabled adaptive brightness in a dark room by default. That might be theory because the 30 or 40 milliseconds specified under Response Times are not what gamers would expect. That increases the electron mobility many times over, and leads to faster response speeds. Sharp introduced this technology to the market, where amorphous silica (aSi TFTs) replaces indium gallium zinc oxide. Unlike the former model ( XPS 13-9343, also SHP1421) this is an IGZO panel. Like in the predecessor, the high resolution is combined with a 10-finger multi-touchscreen, namely the SHP1421 LQ133Y1 by Sharp. This fine resolution is no longer perceptible as pixels to the eye (from about 30 cm/~1 ft), and we thus used our microscope. Brighter display with Content Adaptive Backlight Control (CABC) OFFģ200x1800 pixels on 13 inches - that is quite imposing seeing that we are looking at 276 PPI here.
#E xs max bioshock infinite images update
– Battery Runtime after BIOS update 1.1.7 rating reevaluated! More information concerning other aspects can be found in the in-depth review of the Dell XPS 13 (9350, i5, FHD). We will focus on the performance (increase), on any potential differences in emissions, battery life with the Core i7, and of course the QHD+ panel (3200x1800 pixels). Will that also be the case here? Can users retrieve the maximum possible performance that a Core i7-6500U can accomplish? The Core i7 is also worth a detailed look - after all, the tester praised the fact that the Core i5 model in the XPS 13 did not throttle under high load. Will a negative aspect now be added? Will the pixel monster have an even shorter battery life than the former XPS 13 models?
#E xs max bioshock infinite images pro
The testers highly commended the (FHD, i5) in the test: Apart from a few details, there was a very long list of pro arguments in opposition to modest three key points on the con side. For the original German review, see here.